Search for Indicators
Community
Use the drop-down menu to see data for different locations.
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
County: Cameron
Community / Civic Engagement
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
County: Cameron Voter Turnout: Presidential Election
46.4%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(58.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(41.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(58.4%)
<div>SDOH-07: Increase the proportion of the voting-age citizens who vote</div>
County: Cameron
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
2.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(3.3)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(2.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
County: Cameron Violent Crime Rate
County: Cameron Violent Crime Rate
319.2
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2014-2016)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
TX Value
(420.4)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(386.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(2,994.5 in 2018)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(252.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Average Household Size
County: Cameron Average Household Size
3.20
Persons per household
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.70)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.60)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Female Population
County: Cameron Female Population
50.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(50.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(51.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(50.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Foreign Born Persons
County: Cameron Foreign Born Persons
22.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(17.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Households
County: Cameron Households
132,538
Households
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Male Population
County: Cameron Male Population
49.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(49.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(49.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(49.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
71.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(35.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population American Indian and Alaska Native
County: Cameron Population American Indian and Alaska Native
0.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(0.6% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Asian
County: Cameron Population Asian
0.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(5.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(1.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Black or African American
County: Cameron Population Black or African American
1.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(0.8% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Hispanic or Latino
County: Cameron Population Hispanic or Latino
89.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(40.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(19.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(91.6% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(90.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
County: Cameron Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(0.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(0.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Over Age 65
County: Cameron Population Over Age 65
14.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(17.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(11.6% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(13.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Over Age 65 (Count)
County: Cameron Population Over Age 65 (Count)
57,772
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Two or More Races
County: Cameron Population Two or More Races
0.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(0.5% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Under Age 18
County: Cameron Population Under Age 18
28.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(24.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(32.2% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(28.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population Under Age 5
County: Cameron Population Under Age 5
7.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(9.0% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population White
County: Cameron Population White
96.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(77.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(75.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(97.1% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(97.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
County: Cameron Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
8.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(39.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(58.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(6.9% in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(8.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Total Population
County: Cameron Total Population
426,710
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(424,911)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Veteran Population
County: Cameron Veteran Population
4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Community / Public Safety
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
County: Cameron Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions
9.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 136 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(9.4)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(9.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
County: Cameron Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
County: Cameron Alcohol-Impaired Driving Deaths
16.2%
Percent of driving deaths with alcohol involvement
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,116 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(27.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(17.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron
Community / Social Environment
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Children in Single-Parent Households
County: Cameron Children in Single-Parent Households
36.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(32.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Linguistic Isolation
County: Cameron Linguistic Isolation
15.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 215 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,252 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron People 65+ Living Alone
County: Cameron People 65+ Living Alone
23.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(21.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
County: Cameron People 65+ Living Alone (Count)
13,530
People
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Social Associations
County: Cameron Social Associations
4.9
Membership associations per 10,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(7.4)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(4.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
County: Cameron Substantiated Child Abuse Rate
8.3
Cases per 1,000 children
(2020)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 241 Texas counties.
TX Value
(9.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(9.2 in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Children's Bureau
Prior Value
(8.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.7)
County: Cameron
Community / Transportation
Value
Compared to:
County: Cameron Community Spending on Transportation
County: Cameron Community Spending on Transportation
21.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(21.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(21.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
County: Cameron Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio
5.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
County: Cameron Households without a Vehicle
County: Cameron Households without a Vehicle
6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(6.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Mean Travel Time to Work
County: Cameron Mean Travel Time to Work
20.3
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(22.1)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
County: Cameron Solo Drivers with a Long Commute
22.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(38.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(36.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(24.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
County: Cameron Workers Commuting by Public Transportation
0.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(0.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
County: Cameron Workers who Drive Alone to Work
County: Cameron Workers who Drive Alone to Work
79.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(75.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Rio Grande Valley Regional Value
(77.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Rio Grande Valley Region value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
County: Cameron Workers who Walk to Work
County: Cameron Workers who Walk to Work
1.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
