Search for Indicators
Social Determinants
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Crime & Crime Prevention
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide
3.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Violent Crime Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Violent Crime Rate
2,994.5
Crimes per 100,000 population
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2014-2016)
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
TX Value
(420.4 in 2014-2016)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(386.5 in 2014-2016)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(299.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Demographics
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Female Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Female Population
51.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(50.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(50.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(51.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Male Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Male Population
49.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(49.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work
Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work
22.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability
12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with Health Insurance
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with Health Insurance
69.7%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(80.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(70.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population American Indian and Alaska Native
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population American Indian and Alaska Native
0.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Asian
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Asian
1.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(5.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(5.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Black or African American
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Black or African American
0.8%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(12.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(13.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Hispanic or Latino
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Hispanic or Latino
91.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(39.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(91.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander
0.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(0.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(0.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Over Age 65
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Over Age 65
11.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(12.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(15.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(11.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Two or More Races
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Two or More Races
0.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(0.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 18
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 18
32.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(26.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(22.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(32.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 5
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population Under Age 5
9.0%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(6.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(9.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White
97.1%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(79.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(76.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(97.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Population White (Not Hispanic or Latino)
6.9%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Value
(42.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(60.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population
Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population
1,370,424
People
(2017)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(1,357,644)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Community / Social Environment
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio
28.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children in Single-Parent Households
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children in Single-Parent Households
32.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(25.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with an Internet Subscription
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with an Internet Subscription
77.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(88.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with One or More Types of Computing Devices
89.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(94.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Alone
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Alone
21.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(26.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription
Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription
81.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Employment
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Size of Labor Force
Region: Rio Grande Valley Size of Labor Force
594,905
Persons
(January 2024)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(592,066)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
Region: Rio Grande Valley Unemployed Workers in Civilian Labor Force
6.3%
(January 2024)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on non-seasonally-adjusted data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(4.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(5.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Government Assistance
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households with Cash Public Assistance Income
2.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 196 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,923 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Housing & Homes
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Housing
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Housing
33.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(33.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio
24.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio
17.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Vacancy Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Vacancy Rate
1.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeownership
Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeownership
57.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(56.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(57.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
Region: Rio Grande Valley Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent
51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Severe Housing Problems
Region: Rio Grande Valley Severe Housing Problems
26.3%
(2018)
Compared to:
TX Counties
(2016-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
(2016-2020)
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(17.2% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(16.7% in 2016-2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(26.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio
10.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Income
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gender Pay Gap
Region: Rio Grande Valley Gender Pay Gap
$0.82
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
($0.70)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
($0.67)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households that are Above the Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Threshold
33.8%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(57.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(39.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
37.1%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(27.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(28.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Per Capita Income
Region: Rio Grande Valley Per Capita Income
$20,831
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
($37,514)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Economy / Poverty
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Disability Living in Poverty
31.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(24.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Child Food Insecurity Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Child Food Insecurity Rate
28.6%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(29.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
63.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(41.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(36.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(63.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below Poverty Level
37.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(19.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
48.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 825 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(26.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(22.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(48.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below Poverty Level
24.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Food Insecurity Rate
Region: Rio Grande Valley Food Insecurity Rate
11.5%
(2017)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(14.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households Living Below Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households Living Below Poverty Level
29.1%
(2016)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
TX Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(32.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households Receiving SNAP with Children
Region: Rio Grande Valley Households Receiving SNAP with Children
65.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Value
(60.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(47.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
50.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(30.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(28.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(53.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level
23.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living 200% Above Poverty Level
46.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(67.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(71.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below 200% of Poverty Level
52.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 828 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(31.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(28.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(52.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below Poverty Level
Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below Poverty Level
27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
Region: Rio Grande Valley Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
Region: Rio Grande Valley Students Eligible for the Free Lunch Program
80.8%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 249 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,710 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(56.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(42.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(81.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley
Education / Educational Attainment
Value
Compared to:
Region: Rio Grande Valley College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
13.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Education
Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Education
1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
Region: Rio Grande Valley Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education
31.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 213 Texas counties.
TX Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher
69.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(85.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio
6.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Region: Rio Grande Valley Vocational, Technical, and Other School Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
Region: Rio Grande Valley Vocational, Technical, and Other School Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio
2.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
TX Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
