Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Children's Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Acanthosis Nigricans

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with Acanthosis Nigricans

8.0%
Percent of children
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (8.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic A)

26.7%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (26.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.9%).
Prior Value
(24.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Diabetes (Clinic C)

32.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (24.19%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(24.19%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic A)

18.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (18.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (24.1%).
Prior Value
(24.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Prediabetes (Clinic C)

17.6%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (13.81%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(13.81%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Diabetes

33.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.1 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.9.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 133 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 26.2 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 34.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,937 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (23.8), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.3 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(23.8)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (22.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(22.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (33.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (29.3).
Prior Value
(29.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with a Disability

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children with a Disability

5.5%
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (4.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.5%.
TX Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.5%.
US Value
(4.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

5.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (4.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.4%.
TX Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.4%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Disability

12.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (11.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 12.4%.
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 12.4%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

3.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (3.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.3%.
TX Value
(3.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.3%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

4.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (2.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 4.2%.
TX Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 4.2%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with a Vision Difficulty

3.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (2.5%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.1%.
TX Value
(2.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.1%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

6.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (6.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 6.8%.
TX Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 6.8%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Infants Born to Mothers with <12 Years Education

Current Value:
31.6%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 31.6% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 213 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (19.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(19.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 31.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (31.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

58.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 58.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 74.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 71.1%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 58.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (75.9%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 58.9% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(75.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (58.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (58.6%).
Prior Value
(58.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Health Care

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Health Care

7.2%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (7.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 7.2%.
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 7.2%.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (7.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.2%).
Prior Value
(7.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Health Insurance Spending-to-Income Ratio

8.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.2%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (6.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(6.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (8.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Persons with an Internet Subscription

81.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 81.1% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 86.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.5%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 81.1% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (90.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(90.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 81.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic A)

50.8%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (50.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.6%).
Prior Value
(42.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with High Cholesterol (Clinic C)

49.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (36.74%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(36.74%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic A)

29.3%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (29.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (28.5%).
Prior Value
(28.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults with Hypertension (Clinic C)

34.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (25.64%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(25.64%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cerebrovascular Disease (Stroke)

Current Value:
27.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.3 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 48.1.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 155 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 39.8 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 47.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,338 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (40.1), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.0 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(40.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (37.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(37.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (27.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.4).
Prior Value
(26.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Coronary Heart Disease

Current Value:
117.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 117.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 109.5 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 136.7.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 207 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 117.6 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 98.1 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 121.9.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,852 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (93.7), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 117.6 which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(93.7)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (90.2), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 117.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(90.2)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (117.6) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (106.4).
Prior Value
(106.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Influenza and Pneumonia

Current Value:
11.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 11.2 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,449 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.1), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(12.1)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 11.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (11.2) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.6).
Prior Value
(10.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Low Birthweight

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Low Birthweight

8.3%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 210 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (8.2%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (8.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (39.0%).
Prior Value
(39.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Very Low Birthweight

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Babies with Very Low Birthweight

1.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (1.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
TX Value
(1.4% in 2013)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 1.2% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (1.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (15.3%).
Prior Value
(15.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

53.4%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 53.4% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 60.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 55.5%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 240 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (59.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 53.4% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(59.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (77.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 53.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(77.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (53.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Preterm Births

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Preterm Births

15.2%
(2015)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 193 Texas counties.
Compared to the TX Value (11.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(11.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (15.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (0.0%).
Prior Value
(0.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Suicide

7.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 7.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,307 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (13.5), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(13.5)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.9), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 7.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.9)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (7.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (7.6).
Prior Value
(7.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8)
<div>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adult Day Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

28.3%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.6% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.0%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 28.3% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (15.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 28.3% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(15.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (28.3%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.5%).
Prior Value
(30.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Disability

43.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (35.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 43.8%.
TX Value
(35.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 43.8%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

17.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (14.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 17.4%.
TX Value
(14.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 17.4%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

16.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (8.2%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 16.6%.
TX Value
(8.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 16.6%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

11.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (7.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 11.2%.
TX Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 11.2%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
20.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (14.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 20.8%.
TX Value
(14.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 20.8%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Alzheimer's Disease

Current Value:
38.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 38.1 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.3 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 54.9.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 160 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 38.1 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.2 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (40.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 38.1 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 38.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (38.1) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (33.2).
Prior Value
(33.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic A)

53.1%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (53.1%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (52.7%).
Prior Value
(52.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Obese (Clinic C)

49.2%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (36.91%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(36.91%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic A)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic A)

29.9%
(2017-2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (29.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (30.3%).
Prior Value
(30.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic C)

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Adults who are Overweight (Clinic C)

28.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Community Target (21.02%), the target has not been met.
Community Target
(21.02%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Prevention & Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Falls

2.8
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 988 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (8.2), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(8.2)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (9.8), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(9.8)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (2.8) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.3).
Prior Value
(2.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Unintentional Injuries

Current Value:
24.0
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 51.5 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 63.4.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 164 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.0 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 59.9 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 72.7.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,454 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (40.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.0 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (51.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(51.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (24.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.2).
Prior Value
(23.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.2)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Health / Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Cigarette Spending-to-Income Ratio

2.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.8%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (2.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.6% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (2.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Crime & Crime Prevention

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Homicide

3.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.3 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.4 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.3.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 495 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (6.3), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.3 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(6.3)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 3.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (3.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.0).
Prior Value
(3.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.5)
<div>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Total Population

1,370,424
People
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (1,370,424) is greater  than the previously measured value (1,357,644).
Prior Value
(1,357,644)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Public Safety

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Motor Vehicle Traffic Collisions

Current Value:
9.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.9 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.5.
TX Counties
(2014-2018)
The distribution is based on data from 136 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 9.4 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.2.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 1,266 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.9), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(12.9)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.4), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 9.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (9.4) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (10.2).
Prior Value
(10.2)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Transportation

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Transportation

21.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (18.9%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 21.9%.
TX Value
(18.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 21.9%.
US Value
(17.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (21.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (21.9%).
Prior Value
(21.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Gasoline and Other Fuels Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
5.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.7%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (3.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.8% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(3.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (5.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.2%).
Prior Value
(6.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Mean Travel Time to Work

22.1
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 22.1 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.3.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 252 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 22.1 which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (26.6), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 22.1 which is lower and better.
TX Value
(26.6)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 22.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

0.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 0.3% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.1%.
U.S. Counties
(2015-2019)
The distribution is based on data from 3,142 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (1.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(1.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 0.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Workers who Drive Alone to Work

77.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 77.7% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.7%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 77.7% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (75.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 77.7% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(75.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 77.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Food Insecurity

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Food

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Food

14.4%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (12.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 14.4%.
TX Value
(12.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.6%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 14.4%.
US Value
(12.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (14.4%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.4%).
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Housing

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Housing

33.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (31.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.1%.
TX Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 33.1%.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (33.1%) is less  than the previously measured value (33.2%).
Prior Value
(33.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Renter Spending-to-Income Ratio

24.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.1%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (18.5%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.8% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(18.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (24.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (25.2%).
Prior Value
(25.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Homeowner Spending-to-Income Ratio

17.5%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 17.5% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.4%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 17.5% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (14.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 17.5% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (17.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.7%).
Prior Value
(17.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

Current Value:
51.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 51.4% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 45.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 253 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 51.4% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (49.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 51.4% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(49.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 51.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Utilities Spending-to-Income Ratio

10.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 10.6% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 10.6% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (6.5%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 10.6% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(6.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (10.6%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.5%).
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Gender Pay Gap

$0.82
Cents on the dollar
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value ($0.70), Rio Grande Valley has a value of $0.82 which is higher and better.
TX Value
($0.70)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.73), Rio Grande Valley has a value of $0.82 which is higher and better.
US Value
($0.73)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley ($0.82) is greater and better than the previously measured value ($0.67).
Prior Value
($0.67)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Per Capita Income

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Per Capita Income

$20,831
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of $20,831 which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than $30,711 while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than $26,833.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of $20,831 which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value ($37,514), Rio Grande Valley has a value of $20,831 which is lower and worse.
TX Value
($37,514)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Rio Grande Valley has a value of $20,831 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Children Living Below Poverty Level

37.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 25.4%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 37.6% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (19.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(19.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 37.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Families Living Below Poverty Level

24.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.2%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 242 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (10.7%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(10.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 24.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

23.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 23.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.8%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 23.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (11.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 23.2% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(11.4%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 23.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley People Living Below Poverty Level

27.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.2% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (13.9%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(13.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 27.2% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Education / Childcare & Early Childhood Education

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Day Care Center and Preschool Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:
8.7%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.7% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.1%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.7% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (8.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 8.7% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(8.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (8.7%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.9%).
Prior Value
(8.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Home Child Care Spending-to-Income Ratio

5.1%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.1% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 4.2% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.9%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.1% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 3.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 4.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (3.5%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 5.1% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (5.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (5.7%).
Prior Value
(5.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

Region: Rio Grande Valley College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley College Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

13.0%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 13.0% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.2%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 13.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (12.0%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 13.0% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (13.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (13.6%).
Prior Value
(13.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Education

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Community Spending on Education

1.6%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the TX Value (2.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 1.6%.
TX Value
(2.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 1.6%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (1.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (1.6%).
Prior Value
(1.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
19.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 19.4% which is in the best 50% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 19.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 15.1%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 19.4% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (32.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 19.4% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(32.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 19.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
69.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 84.7% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 79.4%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 69.0% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while regions in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (85.2%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 69.0% which is lower and worse.
TX Value
(85.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 69.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Rio Grande Valley value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio

Current Value:

Region: Rio Grande Valley Student Loan Spending-to-Income Ratio

6.9%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 6.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.6%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 6.9% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.1% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (5.3%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 6.9% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (6.9%) is less and better than the previously measured value (7.5%).
Prior Value
(7.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

Region: Rio Grande Valley Vocational, Technical, and Other School Tuition Spending-to-Income Ratio

2.8%
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to TX Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.0% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.3%.
TX Counties
The distribution is based on data from 254 Texas counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8% which is in the worst 25% of regions. Regions in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while regions in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the TX Value (1.8%), Rio Grande Valley has a value of 2.8% which is higher and worse.
TX Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Texas State value.
Compared to the prior value, Rio Grande Valley (2.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (3.1%).
Prior Value
(3.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV